Comment on Poster – group 2 task 5
After answering questions about some learning strategies our course instructor chose, we drew some nice posters to present our ideas and answers in class.
I’d like to comment on group #2′s poster they created to fulfil task #5. Well, I chose this poster because it has a real clear structure due to it’s schedule-type appearance. But after choosing it I was asking myself: there’s something missing, isn’t it? Indeed, the question to which the poster answers does not appear on top on the poster or at its end … just hope it’s not on the back, that wouldn’t make a lot of sense, wouldn’t it? Consequently, this is the point I’d seriously like to critizise about this poster.
However, I like how the group provides a clear overview about the different types of skills and the questions “how?”, “where ?” , “when?” and “where?”. In this manner they could even safe space to include and example which made it more easy to comprehend. The unitary of the little papers’ colours clearly distinguish the skills from each other, which didn’t work out for group #1 which had to deal with the same task. First I thought I rather favour their poster, but the different colours confused me while reading it.
